I'd say a 22 runner could run around a 50.high. I always heard that the 200m to 400m conversion was 200m time x2 +4 so if I ran a 22.37 I could allegedly run 48.74. 5 years ago. Based on time for one of the following distances - 150m, 200m, Calculations are based on Dick (1987) [1] table of controls for 100/200m/400m athletes. The interesting conversion is the 200m to 300m conversion where you add 13.1 seconds. The 200m is quite different than the 100m, which is why you can have people who excel at one but not the other. It will be helpful to video tape yourself racing (or have someone tape you). Good at showing who has decent speed endurance and who needs more work. We can do this across events and genders using systems like the IAAF conversion tables or the Mercier tables. most important: you're actually properly trained to be able to run a 400. Ended up getting a 400 open of 54.5 and a 4x400 split of 53.6. Who knows? You can add 0.25 - 0.30 second onto hand timings to get a predicted electronic time. Is there a conversion for indoor 400m to outdoor times?

https://www.iaaf.org/news/iaaf-news/scoring-tables-2017. Watch race in slow motion. You are reporting this thread to the moderators for review and possible removal from the forum.

Thoughts? and then select the calculate button to obtain predicted times for the other It's relative accurate. Therefore, if you are trying to break 60 seconds, you need to be able to run a 27.5 second 200m or better as (27.5 x 2) x … Could range anywhere in the 5x.xx you didn't give us quite enough info. Predicts 4x400 split pretty well.

A pretty accurate formula is: My 21.98 PB translates to a 35.08 (but my PB for 300 meters indoors was 35.15) READ Berlin 2009 - Why You Won't See a World Record a Middle Distance or Long Distance Event Two months ago I ran a 55.3 400m after running a 5k. There are no "real" conversions, it all depends on the athlete. I think I can run at least 5:40 right now but my endurance isn't amazing compared to others, obviously. the weather conditions for the 400 are okay. Elite track and field is rife with examples of athletes who have amazing doubles and lackluster ones: Michael Johnson ran 19.32 and 43.18, but only 10.09. Also, I ran a 37 300m today in practice for a workout... not sure why we did a hard workout before a meet on Friday but yeah. When people talk about conversions they tend to be conflating two separate ideas: I run (x) in the 100m, therefore I should be able to run (y) in the 200m.

Divide by 1.00. Back To Index Forum Index. Download the IAAF Scoring Tables if you want the equivalent 400 performance. After that initial phase I'm not sure on how to run it. The idea is that the it's relatively accurate for people that are training specifically for the 400m and happen to be going down in distance for a race in the 200m. Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts, Call me what you want but you can't call me slow. Pay close attention to your running form, especially second 200m.


If you enjoy running really fast, this is the place for you.

Select the distance, enter the athlete's time for that distance I’m a sophomore, 5’10, 135lbs. You are correct. I run a 27 and a 58, New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast. The flaw: that extra 4 seconds is always fixed regardless of the 200m speed. Work on your speed endurance. google_ad_width = 160;

We're fairly good at finding equivalent performances, which is to say a performance as good as, but not necessarily one that you can run. If you quote information from this page in your work, then the reference for this page is: The following Sports Coach pages provide additional information on this topic: The following books provide more information related to this topic: Planning the Training - 6 stages of development. //-->. 200m: 23.37 400m:52.79. Are you out of the blocks quickly or do you run people down in the second half of the 200? Thank you, I think I'm going to go all out for the first 50m or so. Calculations are based on Dick (1987)[1] table of controls for 100/200m/400m athletes. Some 400m athletes sprint all out second 100m of 400m. The algorithms are based on an athlete running the 400 metres in 44 to 66 I usually slow down a little the last 30m which I'm trying to change. (2006) 150m to 600m time Predictions [WWW] Available from: https://www.brianmac.co.uk/sprints/pred600.htm [Accessed 1/6/2020]
(0.25 to .50) seconds slower than first 100m of a 200m sprint. 1 year ago 04/24/2018 8:14pm CDT.

But start in about 24.8 effort, with the first 50 almost as fast as if you were running the 200. The 100m and 200m are electronic timings, the other times are hand timings. With bad speed endurance you won't run 48.74 with a 22.37, with good speed endurance you might run 48.74 with a 22.37 pr. I've also seen great results with the workout 3x200 on waking the infield diagonally for rest. What is your fitness like? Conversion from 200m to 400m . distance is outside the range of the algorithms used in the prediction process. But thanks :).

Other 400m athletes continue to pace it out (0.25 to .50) seconds slower than 200m sprint for second 100m. So all in all it's a fair estimate, as long as your 200m time isn't some statistical outlier, you're trained properly and the weather conditions are okay. MACKENZIE, B. I ran a 39 300 before and have ran a 54... but I'm a 800 guy. 37 300 is pretty good.

Four seconds for most athletes. Press J to jump to the feed. You also have to train to be able to run that 200 PR + 1 pace comfortably/relaxed, to not waste any energy. I believe this is far from the truth. Don’t see the need for a smart a$$ answer. The conversion calculator has been around MileSplit longer than almost any other remaining feature on the site! Not a windy cold day. As for the blocks I'm out quick. Could you finish a mile in 5:15-5:30? I believe this is far from the truth. I always heard that the 200m to 400m conversion was 200m time x2 +4 so if I ran a 22.37 I could allegedly run 48.74. that is turn your legs over youve had 150 to relax and hit your stride, now get to the finish before you tie up. I know it's just a typo, but to clarify for anyone reading and trying to compare times, MJ ran 19.32. Most 400m athletes manage deacceleration the second 200m. 200m time convert to 400m ? I was wondering what that would equate too for maybe beginning or end of the season times for outdoor. 200mTo400m? Archived. Hesitate in start blocks (0.025 to 0.050) seconds. The meet is Friday so that’s why I’m asking to get advice on how to run it. Its highly anaerobic combined with high end aerobic, youll hit your max oxygen consumption about 200 in. It's important to remember that the training and physiology for track and field is highly specific, even for just the next distance up or down.

We engage in discussion of race tactics, training advice, and news around the professional scene. I'd say a 22 runner could run around a 50.high.

You'll get a feel for 400m before mid-May. If you're training like a 200m runner and run a time, it will not give you the following 400m time. Specific endurance. The actual slowdown for most non-elite 400m runners is about 9% from their best 200 meter time. I noticed from a video I don't use my arms a lot so I need to use them more. Look at the world record in the 400, he didnt run the last 200 that fast, he ran it fast for someone who ran the first 200 so fast.

New Start Thread. 300m, 400m, 500m or 600m - it is possible to predict a time (not a guaranteed If you quote information from this page in your work, then the reference for this page is: 1. Ease back the throttle slightly that next 150, last 200 burn baby burn! Your 57 indoors and your comment about not holding form in the last 50 indicate you are weak on speed endurance so your teammates should pencil you in for a 54.5 leg. It may take you a few races to get there, but I've found it useful.

You have good speed as a sophomore.... at best I'd say 51 high - 54 at the very worst. Say, if your pb is 22.30 +2.0 in sunny conditions but after that you never ran close to a 22.3, 22.3*2+4 isn't realistic either. or more like 7:00? I ran a 400m indoors at 57, but this was in February. 200x2+4 is generally accurate, on the following conditions: the 200 is a realistic time.